Effectiveness of short vs. long-distance sprint training on sprinting and agility performance in young soccer players

The purpose of this study was to examine the effects of short sprint-distance training (SST) compared with long sprint-distance training (LST), matched for the total session training volume, on short-, medium- and long-distance sprint performance and agility in young soccer players. Eighteen U19 mal...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Ezequiel Rey (Author), Samuel Carrera (Author), Alexis Padrón-Cabo (Author), Pablo B. Costa (Author)
Format: Book
Published: Termedia Publishing House, 2023-05-01T00:00:00Z.
Subjects:
Online Access:Connect to this object online.
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

MARC

LEADER 00000 am a22000003u 4500
001 doaj_8af4119d5a6340f79b4ce6e096fca35c
042 |a dc 
100 1 0 |a Ezequiel Rey  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Samuel Carrera  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Alexis Padrón-Cabo  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Pablo B. Costa  |e author 
245 0 0 |a Effectiveness of short vs. long-distance sprint training on sprinting and agility performance in young soccer players 
260 |b Termedia Publishing House,   |c 2023-05-01T00:00:00Z. 
500 |a 0860-021X 
500 |a 2083-1862 
500 |a 10.5114/biolsport.2024.127384 
520 |a The purpose of this study was to examine the effects of short sprint-distance training (SST) compared with long sprint-distance training (LST), matched for the total session training volume, on short-, medium- and long-distance sprint performance and agility in young soccer players. Eighteen U19 male players (age: 17.1±0.7 years; height: 178.0±6.3 cm, body mass: 69.4±6.6 kg) were randomly assigned to SST ( n = 9) or LST ( n = 9) group. The intervention programs were performed 2 times a week over 6 weeks. Before and after training period, 5 m, 10 m, 20 m, 30 m and 40 m sprint, and agility were assessed. Within-group analysis showed significant improvements ( p ≤ 0.001) in 5 m, 10 m, 20 m, 30 m and 40 m sprint from pretest to posttest in SST (9.2%, 6.6%, 5.3%, 2.9%, and 2.5%, respectively) and LST (10.5%, 8.5%, 6.5%, 5.1%, and 4.7%, respectively). Players in both SST and LST also showed significant enhancements in agility from pretest to posttest. In the between-groups analysis, there were no differences between the sprint training groups (SST vs. LST) in any variable ( p > 0.05). In conclusion, the findings of this study indicate that both sprint training distances used seem to be effective to improve soccer-specific performance measures. However, due to the better percentage changes obtained by LST group in all fitness variables, this method could be considered as preferred method. 
546 |a EN 
690 |a association football 
690 |a  physical fitness 
690 |a  speed 
690 |a  acceleration 
690 |a  training load 
690 |a Sports medicine 
690 |a RC1200-1245 
690 |a Biology (General) 
690 |a QH301-705.5 
655 7 |a article  |2 local 
786 0 |n Biology of Sport, Vol 41, Iss 1, Pp 87-93 (2023) 
787 0 |n https://www.termedia.pl/Effectiveness-of-short-vs-long-distance-sprint-training-on-sprinting-and-agility-performance-in-young-soccer-players,78,50668,1,1.html 
787 0 |n https://doaj.org/toc/0860-021X 
787 0 |n https://doaj.org/toc/2083-1862 
856 4 1 |u https://doaj.org/article/8af4119d5a6340f79b4ce6e096fca35c  |z Connect to this object online.