Students' perception regarding the replacement of restorations

Introduction: The replacement of defective restorations, which leads to a greater loss of the dental remnant before each replacement, represents the large majority of the dentist's practice. Objective: To determine if there is any variation in students´ clinical criterion in relation to the dec...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Roque Arias (Author), Ignacia Herrera (Author), Cristian Bersezio (Author), Alain Manuel Chaple Gil (Author), Eduardo Fernandez (Author)
Format: Book
Published: Universidad de Ciencias Médicas de La Habana, 2021-04-01T00:00:00Z.
Subjects:
Online Access:Connect to this object online.
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

MARC

LEADER 00000 am a22000003u 4500
001 doaj_8b4331cc965248d0afb4b8b6dbde9f3f
042 |a dc 
100 1 0 |a Roque Arias  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Ignacia Herrera  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Cristian Bersezio  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Alain Manuel Chaple Gil  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Eduardo Fernandez  |e author 
245 0 0 |a Students' perception regarding the replacement of restorations 
260 |b Universidad de Ciencias Médicas de La Habana,   |c 2021-04-01T00:00:00Z. 
500 |a 1729-519X 
520 |a Introduction: The replacement of defective restorations, which leads to a greater loss of the dental remnant before each replacement, represents the large majority of the dentist's practice. Objective: To determine if there is any variation in students´ clinical criterion in relation to the decision of replacement of composite resin restorations prior to and following reconditioning. Material and Methods: A cross-sectional analytical study was conducted. The sample was composed of 40 fifth-year students in a universe of 72.  A set of photographs showing defective restorations in one or more parameters evaluated according to RYGE / USPHS criteria was used.  They were later reconditioned, so there were photographs prior to and following conservative treatment. Based on the photographs shown, a survey in which they had to indicate the choice of treatment was performed. Results: We observed that there is a great variation in the choice of treatment prior to the repair with conservative treatments (38%) and non-conservative ones (62%), compared to the same resin restoration after the choice of conservative treatment (83%) and non-conservative one (17%). Using the McNemar Test, p<0.0001 was obtained between the choice of conservative treatment over the non-conservative one after the restoration reconditioning had been performed. Conclusions: There is a change in perception of the indication of treatment to repair defective restorations towards a conservative alternative after they have undergone minimally invasive procedures. 
546 |a EN 
546 |a ES 
690 |a evaluación 
690 |a percepción 
690 |a restauraciones dentales 
690 |a reparación de restauración dental 
690 |a recambio. 
690 |a Medicine (General) 
690 |a R5-920 
690 |a Public aspects of medicine 
690 |a RA1-1270 
655 7 |a article  |2 local 
786 0 |n Revista Habanera de Ciencias Médicas, Vol 20, Iss 2, Pp e3247-e3247 (2021) 
787 0 |n http://www.revhabanera.sld.cu/index.php/rhab/article/view/3247 
787 0 |n https://doaj.org/toc/1729-519X 
856 4 1 |u https://doaj.org/article/8b4331cc965248d0afb4b8b6dbde9f3f  |z Connect to this object online.