The difference between porcelain and composite resin shear bond strength in the administration of 4% and 19.81% silane
Background: Damage to porcelain restorations such as fractures requires a repair that can be performed either directly or indirectly. Direct repair involves directly performing restoration of fractured porcelain with a composite resin application. This technique has more advantages than indirect rep...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | Ira Widjiastuti (Author), Dwina Rahmawati Junaedi (Author), Ruslan Effendy (Author) |
---|---|
Format: | Book |
Published: |
Universitas Airlangga,
2019-03-01T00:00:00Z.
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | Connect to this object online. |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Similar Items
-
Shear Bond Strength of Composite-Resin to Porcelain: Effect of Thermocycling
by: M. Khoroushi, et al.
Published: (2007) -
Comparison of Shear Bond Strength between Composite Resin and Porcelain Using Different Bonding Systems
by: E.Yassini, et al.
Published: (2005) -
Effect of different adhesive systems and silane application on shear bond strength of resin cement to indirect restorations
by: Makbule Heval Şahan, et al.
Published: (2023) -
The Bond Strength of Orthodontic Resins to Porcelain
by: White Gregory J., et al.
Published: (1993) -
Shear bond strength of orthodontic buccal tubes to porcelain
by: Kathiravan Purmal, et al.
Published: (2013)