Towards a Standardized Machine-Readable Metadata Format for MOOC Platforms

Nowadays, there are many online courses like MOOCs (Massive Open Online Courses) available from different providers (e.g. edX, Coursera, openHPI, OpenWHO, iMOOX). To support learners, aggregators like Class Central or MOOChub were established. These aggregators hold catalogs with the offerings of th...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Max Thomas (Author), Thomas Staubitz (Author), Christoph Meinel (Author)
Format: Book
Published: FernUniversität Hagen, 2023-10-01T00:00:00Z.
Subjects:
Online Access:Connect to this object online.
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

MARC

LEADER 00000 am a22000003u 4500
001 doaj_8ef7abd6af3c40d1b27e61017b5e4dc9
042 |a dc 
100 1 0 |a Max Thomas  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Thomas Staubitz  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Christoph Meinel  |e author 
245 0 0 |a Towards a Standardized Machine-Readable Metadata Format for MOOC Platforms 
260 |b FernUniversität Hagen,   |c 2023-10-01T00:00:00Z. 
500 |a 1860-7470 
520 |a Nowadays, there are many online courses like MOOCs (Massive Open Online Courses) available from different providers (e.g. edX, Coursera, openHPI, OpenWHO, iMOOX). To support learners, aggregators like Class Central or MOOChub were established. These aggregators hold catalogs with the offerings of the providers making them a central entry point for the users. Such catalogs are based on metadata, which needs to be formatted in a proper way. This metadata can then be used for filtering courses and recommendation engines also. With more and more emerging AI-based recommendation services for learning opportunities and learning path assistants, the need for well-maintained and meaningful metadata is growing massively. In this paper, we report on our research about different systems for categorizing the fields of study, topic, or subject, which can be used to enhance existing metadata formats. An overview of field of study categorization systems of different entities (e.g. international, national, and private organizations) is given. The systems are compared regarding their usefulness in metadata formats for the description of courses. The results are utilized to refine our own metadata format and represent a further step towards a standardized metadata format for courses and automatically generated metadata. 
546 |a DE 
546 |a EN 
690 |a e-learning 
690 |a metadata 
690 |a standards 
690 |a fields of study 
690 |a mooc 
690 |a Education 
690 |a L 
655 7 |a article  |2 local 
786 0 |n E-learning and Education, Vol 15, Iss 2 (2023) 
787 0 |n https://www.eleed.de/archive/se2023/5780 
787 0 |n https://doaj.org/toc/1860-7470 
856 4 1 |u https://doaj.org/article/8ef7abd6af3c40d1b27e61017b5e4dc9  |z Connect to this object online.