Modeling the Total Energy Costs of Resistance Exercise: a Work in Progress

We present an aerobic and anaerobic, exercise and recovery energy cost model of intermittent energy costs utilizing task (work, Joules) as opposed to rate (per minute) measurements. Low to moderate intensity steady state exercise energy costs are typically portrayed as the volumetric rate at which o...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Victor M. Reis (Author), Christopher B. Scott (Author)
Format: Book
Published: Wydawnictwo Naukowe Uniwersytetu Szczecińskiego, 2016-01-01T00:00:00Z.
Subjects:
Online Access:Connect to this object online.
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

MARC

LEADER 00000 am a22000003u 4500
001 doaj_9af76f96b12d433bbbb917d67dbde1e2
042 |a dc 
100 1 0 |a Victor M. Reis  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Christopher B. Scott  |e author 
245 0 0 |a Modeling the Total Energy Costs of Resistance Exercise: a Work in Progress 
260 |b Wydawnictwo Naukowe Uniwersytetu Szczecińskiego,   |c 2016-01-01T00:00:00Z. 
500 |a 10.18276/cej.2016.2-01 
500 |a 2300-9705 
500 |a 2353-2807 
520 |a We present an aerobic and anaerobic, exercise and recovery energy cost model of intermittent energy costs utilizing task (work, Joules) as opposed to rate (per minute) measurements. Low to moderate intensity steady state exercise energy costs are typically portrayed as the volumetric rate at which oxygen is consumed (VO2 L min–1), where a proportionate upward climbing linear relationship is profiled with an increasing power output; add to this the concept of the anaerobic threshold and energy costs increase with more intense aerobic exercise in disproportion to VO2 L min–1 measurements. As a per task function, intermittent work and recovery bouts contain a combined estimate of total costs, that is as kJ or kcal (not kJ.min-1 or kcal.min-1). Adopting this approach to describe single and multiple sets of resistance training, the model that emerges for intermittent resistance exercise portrays linearity between equivalent work and total energy costs that differs proportionately among conditions – “continuous” muscular endurance vs. Intermittent higher load strength work, moderately paced vs. slower and faster conditions, smaller vs. larger working muscle masses and failure (fatigue) vs. non-failure states. Moreover, per kcal (or kJ) of total energy costs, work (J) is more inefficient with a greater load and lower repetition number as opposed to lower resistance with an increased number of repetitions. The concept of energy costs Rusing disproportionately with increased or prolonged work does not appear to apply to resistance exercise. 
546 |a EN 
690 |a intermittent exercise 
690 |a oxygen uptake 
690 |a weight lifting 
690 |a Sports 
690 |a GV557-1198.995 
690 |a Sports medicine 
690 |a RC1200-1245 
690 |a Physiology 
690 |a QP1-981 
655 7 |a article  |2 local 
786 0 |n Central European Journal of Sport Sciences and Medicine, Vol 14 (2016) 
787 0 |n https://wnus.edu.pl/cejssm/en/issue/124/article/1296/ 
787 0 |n https://doaj.org/toc/2300-9705 
787 0 |n https://doaj.org/toc/2353-2807 
856 4 1 |u https://doaj.org/article/9af76f96b12d433bbbb917d67dbde1e2  |z Connect to this object online.