Guided self-study in preclinical physiotherapy students - A feasibility study

Background: Literature describing the impact of guided self-study (G-SS) in knowledge changes and skills improvements in undergraduate students is scarce. Objectives: The aims of our study were to evaluate the feasibility of a G-SS programme in a full-time undergraduate physiotherapy degree course a...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Elisabeth Schenk (Author), Jan Taeymans (Author), Slavko Rogan (Author)
Format: Book
Published: AOSIS, 2023-10-01T00:00:00Z.
Subjects:
Online Access:Connect to this object online.
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

MARC

LEADER 00000 am a22000003u 4500
001 doaj_a4bec652bf734e3c83fa91c74c973fa1
042 |a dc 
100 1 0 |a Elisabeth Schenk  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Jan Taeymans  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Slavko Rogan  |e author 
245 0 0 |a Guided self-study in preclinical physiotherapy students - A feasibility study 
260 |b AOSIS,   |c 2023-10-01T00:00:00Z. 
500 |a 0379-6175 
500 |a 2410-8219 
500 |a 10.4102/sajp.v79i1.1866 
520 |a Background: Literature describing the impact of guided self-study (G-SS) in knowledge changes and skills improvements in undergraduate students is scarce. Objectives: The aims of our study were to evaluate the feasibility of a G-SS programme in a full-time undergraduate physiotherapy degree course and to assess the effectiveness of the G-SS on changes in knowledge and development of skills (hands-on). Method: Fifty-three first-semester undergraduate physiotherapy students were randomly divided into a G-SS group and a control group (CG). The G-SS group received six clinical cases and prepared each case during an 8-day cycle. The control group received self-study learning units of the original curriculum content. Primary outcome parameters were (1) time of task, (2) responsiveness of students and (3) programme differentiation. Knowledge changes and skills changes were tested using a multiple-choice questionnaire and the objective structured clinical examination (OSCE). Results: Students' responsiveness was 32%. This was below the a priori set 83%. No differences in programme differentiation were found. The OSCE grade was significantly higher in the G-SS compared to CG (p = 0.003). Conclusion: The G-SS programme in its current form was not feasible regarding students' responsiveness. Therefore, a slight modification of our study protocol (e.g., better time planning in the academic calendar) is needed to improve students' willingness to participate in the G-SS programme. Clinical implications: Adaptation of the school timetable should allow undergraduate physiotherapy students to prepare clinical cases under conditions of lower workload. Guided self-study as compared to CG is superior in knowledge change and (hands-on) skills improvement. 
546 |a EN 
690 |a higher education 
690 |a learning gain 
690 |a self-study 
690 |a teacher-centred instruction 
690 |a self-directed learning 
690 |a Therapeutics. Pharmacology 
690 |a RM1-950 
655 7 |a article  |2 local 
786 0 |n South African Journal of Physiotherapy, Vol 79, Iss 1, Pp e1-e7 (2023) 
787 0 |n https://sajp.co.za/index.php/sajp/article/view/1866 
787 0 |n https://doaj.org/toc/0379-6175 
787 0 |n https://doaj.org/toc/2410-8219 
856 4 1 |u https://doaj.org/article/a4bec652bf734e3c83fa91c74c973fa1  |z Connect to this object online.