L'encadrement collégial : complexité et enjeux pour la professionnalisation de l'accompagnement doctoral

In a context of professionalization of doctoral training, doctoral supervision refers to a decompartmentalization of the doctoral student-supervisor pair. If team supervision has become an international standard and a common practice in France, the literature in the field remains focused on the dual...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Nathalie Girard (Author)
Format: Book
Published: Association Internationale de Pédagogie Universitaire.
Subjects:
Online Access:Connect to this object online.
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

MARC

LEADER 00000 am a22000003u 4500
001 doaj_ba319b1dc6ec45e7a7d3362f6f1dcdd6
042 |a dc 
100 1 0 |a Nathalie Girard  |e author 
245 0 0 |a L'encadrement collégial : complexité et enjeux pour la professionnalisation de l'accompagnement doctoral 
260 |b Association Internationale de Pédagogie Universitaire. 
500 |a 2076-8427 
500 |a 10.4000/ripes.4476 
520 |a In a context of professionalization of doctoral training, doctoral supervision refers to a decompartmentalization of the doctoral student-supervisor pair. If team supervision has become an international standard and a common practice in France, the literature in the field remains focused on the dual relationship between a doctoral student and their supervisor. The objective of this article is to describe the diversity of organizational configurations of doctoral supervision teams. From a training system at INRAE, we have built a database on 76 theses, with the structural characteristics of the thesis and its support, but also the difficulties expressed by the PhD students and supervisors. The analysis of these data allows us to identify four types of doctoral supervision teams, beyond the pairs between a doctoral student and a supervisor. The organizational forms thus identified, sometimes classic, others more complex constituting multidisciplinary and/or multi-institutional teams around the doctoral student, sometimes extended to socio-economic actors, are described and confronted with the difficulties expressed by the stakeholders of these theses. The cross-sectional analysis of these results allows us to identify avenues for the training of doctoral students and supervisors, critical issues for the institutions that host these theses, but also research perspectives in the field of doctoral support. 
546 |a FR 
690 |a interdisciplinarité 
690 |a typologie 
690 |a encadrement doctoral collégial 
690 |a configuration organisationnelle 
690 |a recherches finalisées 
690 |a Education 
690 |a L 
690 |a Special aspects of education 
690 |a LC8-6691 
655 7 |a article  |2 local 
786 0 |n Revue Internationale de Pédagogie de l'Enseignement Supérieur, Vol 39 
787 0 |n https://journals.openedition.org/ripes/4476 
787 0 |n https://doaj.org/toc/2076-8427 
856 4 1 |u https://doaj.org/article/ba319b1dc6ec45e7a7d3362f6f1dcdd6  |z Connect to this object online.