Synthesizing study results in a systematic review
A single study rarely suffices to underpin treatment or policy decisions. This creates a strong imperative for systematic reviews. Authors of reviews need a method to synthesize the results of several studies, regardless of whether or which statistical method is used. In this article, we provide arg...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | Jos Verbeek (Author), Jani Ruotsalainen (Author), Jan L Hoving (Author) |
---|---|
Format: | Book |
Published: |
Nordic Association of Occupational Safety and Health (NOROSH),
2012-05-01T00:00:00Z.
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | Connect to this object online. |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Similar Items
-
Evidence-informed decision about (de-)implementing return-to-work coordination to reduce sick leave: a case study
by: Christina Tikka, et al.
Published: (2022) -
Perceptions on best ways to measure work participation. An international survey among randomized controlled trialists and Cochrane systematic reviewers
by: Margarita Ravinskaya, et al.
Published: (2022) -
Synthesizing Systematically
by: Sonali Vijay Deshmukh
Published: (2019) -
The reporting of work participation outcomes and measurement methods in randomized controlled trials: a systematic review
by: Jan Hoving, et al.
Published: (2022) -
Synthesizing Dimensions of Digital Maturity in Hospitals: Systematic Review
by: Rhona Duncan, et al.
Published: (2022)