Problem‐based shared decision making: The role of canonical SDM steps
Abstract Objective To evaluate the extent to which the canonical steps of shared decision making (SDM) take place in clinical encounters in practice and across SDM forms. Methods We assessed 100 randomly selected video‐recorded primary care encounters, obtained as part of a randomized trial of an SD...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | Victor M. Montori (Author), Merel M. Ruissen (Author), Megan E. Branda (Author), Ian G. Hargraves (Author), Marleen Kunneman (Author) |
---|---|
Format: | Book |
Published: |
Wiley,
2023-02-01T00:00:00Z.
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | Connect to this object online. |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Similar Items
-
Enrolling people of color to evaluate a practice intervention: lessons from the shared decision-making for atrial fibrillation (SDM4AFib) trial
by: Angela Sivly, et al.
Published: (2022) -
Reflecting on shared decision making: A reflection‐quantification study
by: Marleen Kunneman, et al.
Published: (2019) -
Shared Decision-Making (SDM) Toolkit: Train-the-Trainer Tools for Teaching SDM in the Classroom and Clinic
by: Shawn Mincer, et al.
Published: (2013) -
Patient readiness for shared decision making about treatment: Conceptualisation and development of the ReadySDM
by: Sascha M. Keij, et al.
Published: (2024) -
The impact of decision aids to enhance shared decision making for diabetes (the DAD study): protocol of a cluster randomized trial
by: LeBlanc Annie, et al.
Published: (2012)