Comparative Investigation of Human Amniotic Epithelial Cells and Mesenchymal Stem Cells for Application in Bone Tissue Engineering

Emerging evidence suggests amniotic epithelial cells (AECs) as a promising source of progenitor cells in regenerative medicine and bone tissue engineering. However, investigations comparing the regenerative properties of AECs with other sources of stem cells are particularly needed before the feasib...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Jiawen Si (Author), Jiewen Dai (Author), Jianjun Zhang (Author), Sha Liu (Author), Jing Gu (Author), Jun Shi (Author), Steve G. F. Shen (Author), Lihe Guo (Author)
Format: Book
Published: Hindawi Limited, 2015-01-01T00:00:00Z.
Subjects:
Online Access:Connect to this object online.
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

MARC

LEADER 00000 am a22000003u 4500
001 doaj_e9c95266a7e94d65a59b0a75ff4e2f28
042 |a dc 
100 1 0 |a Jiawen Si  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Jiewen Dai  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Jianjun Zhang  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Sha Liu  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Jing Gu  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Jun Shi  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Steve G. F. Shen  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Lihe Guo  |e author 
245 0 0 |a Comparative Investigation of Human Amniotic Epithelial Cells and Mesenchymal Stem Cells for Application in Bone Tissue Engineering 
260 |b Hindawi Limited,   |c 2015-01-01T00:00:00Z. 
500 |a 1687-966X 
500 |a 1687-9678 
500 |a 10.1155/2015/565732 
520 |a Emerging evidence suggests amniotic epithelial cells (AECs) as a promising source of progenitor cells in regenerative medicine and bone tissue engineering. However, investigations comparing the regenerative properties of AECs with other sources of stem cells are particularly needed before the feasibility of AECs in bone tissue engineering can be determined. This study aimed to compare human amniotic epithelial cells (hAECs), human bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells (hBMSCs), and human amniotic fluid derived mesenchymal stem cells (hAFMSCs) in terms of their morphology, proliferation, immunophenotype profile, and osteogenic capacity in vitro and in vivo. Not only greatly distinguished by cell morphology and proliferation, hAECs, hAFMSCs, and hBMSCs exhibited remarkably different signature regarding immunophenotypical profile. Microarray analysis revealed a different expression profile of genes involved in ossification along the three cell sources, highlighting the impact of different anatomical origin and molecular response to osteogenic induction on the final tissue-forming potential. Furthermore, our data indicated a potential role of FOXC2 in early osteogenic commitment. 
546 |a EN 
690 |a Internal medicine 
690 |a RC31-1245 
655 7 |a article  |2 local 
786 0 |n Stem Cells International, Vol 2015 (2015) 
787 0 |n http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/565732 
787 0 |n https://doaj.org/toc/1687-966X 
787 0 |n https://doaj.org/toc/1687-9678 
856 4 1 |u https://doaj.org/article/e9c95266a7e94d65a59b0a75ff4e2f28  |z Connect to this object online.