Comparative Investigation of Human Amniotic Epithelial Cells and Mesenchymal Stem Cells for Application in Bone Tissue Engineering
Emerging evidence suggests amniotic epithelial cells (AECs) as a promising source of progenitor cells in regenerative medicine and bone tissue engineering. However, investigations comparing the regenerative properties of AECs with other sources of stem cells are particularly needed before the feasib...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Book |
Published: |
Hindawi Limited,
2015-01-01T00:00:00Z.
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | Connect to this object online. |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
MARC
LEADER | 00000 am a22000003u 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | doaj_e9c95266a7e94d65a59b0a75ff4e2f28 | ||
042 | |a dc | ||
100 | 1 | 0 | |a Jiawen Si |e author |
700 | 1 | 0 | |a Jiewen Dai |e author |
700 | 1 | 0 | |a Jianjun Zhang |e author |
700 | 1 | 0 | |a Sha Liu |e author |
700 | 1 | 0 | |a Jing Gu |e author |
700 | 1 | 0 | |a Jun Shi |e author |
700 | 1 | 0 | |a Steve G. F. Shen |e author |
700 | 1 | 0 | |a Lihe Guo |e author |
245 | 0 | 0 | |a Comparative Investigation of Human Amniotic Epithelial Cells and Mesenchymal Stem Cells for Application in Bone Tissue Engineering |
260 | |b Hindawi Limited, |c 2015-01-01T00:00:00Z. | ||
500 | |a 1687-966X | ||
500 | |a 1687-9678 | ||
500 | |a 10.1155/2015/565732 | ||
520 | |a Emerging evidence suggests amniotic epithelial cells (AECs) as a promising source of progenitor cells in regenerative medicine and bone tissue engineering. However, investigations comparing the regenerative properties of AECs with other sources of stem cells are particularly needed before the feasibility of AECs in bone tissue engineering can be determined. This study aimed to compare human amniotic epithelial cells (hAECs), human bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells (hBMSCs), and human amniotic fluid derived mesenchymal stem cells (hAFMSCs) in terms of their morphology, proliferation, immunophenotype profile, and osteogenic capacity in vitro and in vivo. Not only greatly distinguished by cell morphology and proliferation, hAECs, hAFMSCs, and hBMSCs exhibited remarkably different signature regarding immunophenotypical profile. Microarray analysis revealed a different expression profile of genes involved in ossification along the three cell sources, highlighting the impact of different anatomical origin and molecular response to osteogenic induction on the final tissue-forming potential. Furthermore, our data indicated a potential role of FOXC2 in early osteogenic commitment. | ||
546 | |a EN | ||
690 | |a Internal medicine | ||
690 | |a RC31-1245 | ||
655 | 7 | |a article |2 local | |
786 | 0 | |n Stem Cells International, Vol 2015 (2015) | |
787 | 0 | |n http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/565732 | |
787 | 0 | |n https://doaj.org/toc/1687-966X | |
787 | 0 | |n https://doaj.org/toc/1687-9678 | |
856 | 4 | 1 | |u https://doaj.org/article/e9c95266a7e94d65a59b0a75ff4e2f28 |z Connect to this object online. |