Evaluating the Efficiency and Staff Satisfaction of the Point-of-Care IV Activated System Versus Traditional Piggyback in Administering IV Antibiotics at a Saudi Tertiary Hospital
Background: This study aims to compare resource utilization and staff satisfaction between the point-of-care (POC) activated system and the traditional intravenous piggyback (PB) system in hospital pharmacy settings. Methods: Employing a pre-post quasi-experimental design from November 2019 to April...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Book |
Published: |
MDPI AG,
2024-10-01T00:00:00Z.
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | Connect to this object online. |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
MARC
LEADER | 00000 am a22000003u 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | doaj_ec6fc46cbc3c46ce839a8eee1fa46ea7 | ||
042 | |a dc | ||
100 | 1 | 0 | |a Khaled Elshammaa |e author |
700 | 1 | 0 | |a Abubakr A. Yousif |e author |
700 | 1 | 0 | |a Abdullah Alshammari |e author |
700 | 1 | 0 | |a Mohammed Alnuhait |e author |
700 | 1 | 0 | |a Abdulmalik S. Alotaibi |e author |
700 | 1 | 0 | |a Mahmoud E. Elrggal |e author |
700 | 1 | 0 | |a Mohamed Hassan Elnaem |e author |
245 | 0 | 0 | |a Evaluating the Efficiency and Staff Satisfaction of the Point-of-Care IV Activated System Versus Traditional Piggyback in Administering IV Antibiotics at a Saudi Tertiary Hospital |
260 | |b MDPI AG, |c 2024-10-01T00:00:00Z. | ||
500 | |a 10.3390/pharmacy12050158 | ||
500 | |a 2226-4787 | ||
520 | |a Background: This study aims to compare resource utilization and staff satisfaction between the point-of-care (POC) activated system and the traditional intravenous piggyback (PB) system in hospital pharmacy settings. Methods: Employing a pre-post quasi-experimental design from November 2019 to April 2020, the study assessed resource requirements for both the POC activated system and the traditional PB system. Additionally, a staff satisfaction survey was conducted, focusing on staff experiences related to the pharmacy preparation process and the subsequent activation of the system by nurses. Results: The POC activated system required significantly fewer full-time equivalents (FTEs) per month compared to the PB system (0.36 ± 0.05 vs. 1.56 ± 0.07; <i>p</i> < 0.0001). Using POC in automated dispensing cabinets (ADCs) reduced medication administration time and returns (6.41% vs. 1.75%; <i>p</i> < 0.0001). The staff satisfaction survey revealed greater satisfaction with the POC activated system. A subsequent analysis showed the POC activated system had a low expiration rate of 0.1% and a cost of 39 Saudi riyal, while the traditional system had higher expiration rates and cost of 46,260 SR. Conclusions: The POC activated system reduced FTEs, decreased returned medications, and enhanced staff satisfaction compared to the PB system. | ||
546 | |a EN | ||
690 | |a intravenous infusions | ||
690 | |a pharmacy practice | ||
690 | |a point-of-care | ||
690 | |a automated dispensing cabinets and piggyback | ||
690 | |a Pharmacy and materia medica | ||
690 | |a RS1-441 | ||
655 | 7 | |a article |2 local | |
786 | 0 | |n Pharmacy, Vol 12, Iss 5, p 158 (2024) | |
787 | 0 | |n https://www.mdpi.com/2226-4787/12/5/158 | |
787 | 0 | |n https://doaj.org/toc/2226-4787 | |
856 | 4 | 1 | |u https://doaj.org/article/ec6fc46cbc3c46ce839a8eee1fa46ea7 |z Connect to this object online. |