BERPIKIR MATEMATIS RIGOR: KONTRIBUSI PADA PENGEMBANGAN PENGETAHUAN METAKOGNITIF-SELF ASSESSMENT MAHASISWA

This study aims to analyze students' rigorous mathematical thinking from three levels of cognitive function structures associated with their contribution to self-assessment metacognitive knowledge in Real Number System lectures. This research is qualitative research with a type of case study. T...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Siska Firmasari (Author), Dadang Juandi (Author)
Format: Book
Published: Universitas Muhammadiyah Metro, 2021-07-01T00:00:00Z.
Subjects:
Online Access:Connect to this object online.
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

MARC

LEADER 00000 am a22000003u 4500
001 doaj_f72b397911e94df9b4e559b2d078539c
042 |a dc 
100 1 0 |a Siska Firmasari  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Dadang Juandi  |e author 
245 0 0 |a BERPIKIR MATEMATIS RIGOR: KONTRIBUSI PADA PENGEMBANGAN PENGETAHUAN METAKOGNITIF-SELF ASSESSMENT MAHASISWA 
260 |b Universitas Muhammadiyah Metro,   |c 2021-07-01T00:00:00Z. 
500 |a 2089-8703 
500 |a 2442-5419 
500 |a 10.24127/ajpm.v10i2.3430 
520 |a This study aims to analyze students' rigorous mathematical thinking from three levels of cognitive function structures associated with their contribution to self-assessment metacognitive knowledge in Real Number System lectures. This research is qualitative research with a type of case study. The research subjects were three students of the Mathematics Education Study Program who contracted the Real Number. System course selecting research subjects based on test results identifies students into three rigorous mathematical thinking cognitive function structure levels. This study's results indicate that rigorous mathematical thinking contributes to students' self-assessment metacognitive knowledge. The quality of review of students who have a rigorous mathematical thinking level can lead to thoroughness, intellectual perseverance, critical investigation, and truth-seeking in solving problems appropriately, structurally, and systematically into a direct experience in the learning process is described as metacognitive. Students at the level of abstract relational thinking can assess their own abilities very well, learn independently, and choose with certainty how to solve problems by placing the right method. Qualitative thinking level students focus more on symbols or symbols and represent their knowledge through visualization. He prefers that the type of evaluation problem solving is not in the form of long, detailed sentences but instead immediately transforms the sentences into clear mathematical symbols 
546 |a ID 
690 |a Education 
690 |a L 
690 |a Mathematics 
690 |a QA1-939 
655 7 |a article  |2 local 
786 0 |n Aksioma: Jurnal Program Studi Pendidikan Matematika, Vol 10, Iss 2, Pp 1222-1233 (2021) 
787 0 |n https://ojs.fkip.ummetro.ac.id/index.php/matematika/article/view/3430 
787 0 |n https://doaj.org/toc/2089-8703 
787 0 |n https://doaj.org/toc/2442-5419 
856 4 1 |u https://doaj.org/article/f72b397911e94df9b4e559b2d078539c  |z Connect to this object online.