Using collaborative logic analysis evaluation to test the program theory of an intensive interdisciplinary pain treatment for youth with pain‐related disability
Abstract Intensive interdisciplinary pain treatment (IIPT) involves multiple stakeholders. Mapping the program components to its anticipated outcomes (ie, its theory) can be difficult and requires stakeholder engagement. Evidence is lacking, however, on how best to engage them. Logic analysis, a the...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | Karen Hurtubise (Author), Astrid Brousselle (Author), Chantal Camden (Author) |
---|---|
Format: | Book |
Published: |
Wiley,
2020-12-01T00:00:00Z.
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | Connect to this object online. |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Similar Items
-
Youth and parent perceptions on participating in specialized multidisciplinary pain rehabilitation options: A qualitative timeline effect analysis
by: Karen Hurtubise, et al.
Published: (2021) -
Baseline Factors Associated with Pain Intensity, Pain Catastrophizing, and Pain Interference in Intensive Interdisciplinary Pain Treatment for Youth
by: Rob D. Long, et al.
Published: (2023) -
Sleep among Youth with Severely Disabling Chronic Pain: Before, during, and after Inpatient Intensive Interdisciplinary Pain Treatment
by: Kendra N. Krietsch, et al.
Published: (2021) -
Interdisciplinary Collaborative Care to Manage Total Pain in Children with Cancer
by: Karen M. Moody
Published: (2022) -
Do Commonly Used Measures of Pain Intensity Only Reflect Pain Intensity in Youths With Bothersome Pain and a Physical Disability?
by: Jordi Miró, et al.
Published: (2019)