Microleakage evaluation of Silorane-based composite and Methacrylate-based composite in class II box preparations using two different layering techniques: An in vitro study
Aim: The aim of this study was to compare the microleakage in Class II box preparations with the gingival margin above and below the cemento-enamel junction (CEJ) restored with Silorane composite and methacrylate composite using two different layering techniques. Materials and Methods: Standardized...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | Asha Joseph (Author), Lekha Santhosh (Author), Jayshree Hegde (Author), Srinivas Panchajanya (Author), Reshmi George (Author) |
---|---|
Format: | Book |
Published: |
Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications,
2013-01-01T00:00:00Z.
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | Connect to this object online. |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Similar Items
-
Microleakage Evaluation of Silorane-Based Composites Versus Low Shirinkage Methacrylate-Based Composites
by: Hamid Kermanshah, et al.
Published: (2013) -
Evaluation of Microleakage in Class V Cavities Filled with Methacrylate-based versus Silorane-based Composites
by: Sharafeddin F, et al.
Published: (2015) -
Effect of cyclic loading on microleakage of silorane based composite compared with low shrinkage methacrylate-based composites
by: Hamid Kermanshah, et al.
Published: (2016) -
Effect of 38% carbamide peroxide on the microleakage of silorane-based versus methacrylate-based composite restorations
by: Sedighe Sadat Hashemi Kamangar, et al.
Published: (2014) -
Cytotoxicity evaluation of methacrylate- and silorane-based composite resins
by: Digdem Eren, et al.
Published: (2012)