Deliberation and decisions in the IRB process

Institutional review boards (IRBs) regularly vote to resolve conflict. This article argues that voting minimizes protections for human subjects and violates moral order. Rather than vote, IRBs should be mediating disputes, which respects the moral difference and integrity of IRB members.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Nancy Neveloff Dubler (Author)
Format: Book
Published: Social Medicine Publication Group, 2013-11-01T00:00:00Z.
Subjects:
Online Access:Connect to this object online.
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

Internet

Connect to this object online.

3rd Floor Main Library

Holdings details from 3rd Floor Main Library
Call Number: A1234.567
Copy 1 Available