A systematic tale of two differing reviews: evaluating the evidence on public and private sector quality of primary care in low and middle income countries
Abstract Systematic reviews are powerful tools for summarizing vast amounts of data in controversial areas; but their utility is limited by methodological choices and assumptions. Two systematic reviews of literature on the quality of private sector primary care in low and middle income countries (L...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | Jorge Coarasa (Author), Jishnu Das (Author), Elizabeth Gummerson (Author), Asaf Bitton (Author) |
---|---|
Format: | Book |
Published: |
BMC,
2017-04-01T00:00:00Z.
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | Connect to this object online. |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Similar Items
-
The use of private-sector contracts for primary health care: theory, evidence and lessons for low-income and middle-income countries
by: Natasha Palmer
Published: (2000) -
Promoting safe motherhood through the private sector in low- and middle-income countries
by: Brugha Ruairí, et al.
Published: (2003) -
Understanding the decision making process of selection of medicines in the private sector in South Africa - lessons for low-middle income countries
by: Velisha Ann Perumal-Pillay, et al.
Published: (2020) -
Evidence-based medicine in low-income and middle-income countries
by: Sudeep Adhikari
Published: (2021) -
What can be done about the private health sector in low-income countries?
by: Mills Anne, et al.
Published: (2002)