Supporting Students' Argumentation Structure Construction using Indeterminacy of Diagram

In this study, we analyze students' argumentation structures constructed using semiotic mediation activities involving a task with indeterminate diagrams. The main purpose of this article is to reveal how semiotic mediation activities engaged indeterminacy of diagram to support students' a...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Kyeong-Hwa Lee (Author), Jeong-Won Noh (Author), Sung-Jae Moon (Author)
Format: Book
Published: Korea Society of Educational Studies in Mathematics, 2020-08-01T00:00:00Z.
Subjects:
Online Access:Connect to this object online.
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

MARC

LEADER 00000 am a22000003u 4500
001 doaj_fc9dd62dc3234a41b10f82d3e33f62cb
042 |a dc 
100 1 0 |a Kyeong-Hwa Lee  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Jeong-Won Noh  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Sung-Jae Moon  |e author 
245 0 0 |a Supporting Students' Argumentation Structure Construction using Indeterminacy of Diagram 
260 |b Korea Society of Educational Studies in Mathematics,   |c 2020-08-01T00:00:00Z. 
500 |a 2288-7733 
500 |a 10.29275/jerm.2020.08.sp.1.199 
520 |a In this study, we analyze students' argumentation structures constructed using semiotic mediation activities involving a task with indeterminate diagrams. The main purpose of this article is to reveal how semiotic mediation activities engaged indeterminacy of diagram to support students' argumentation structure construction. To this end, we use Toulmin's model to illustrate how students construct and elaborate their conjectures and arguments about geometrical properties in the process of actualizing virtual relationships between the given diagrams. The findings indicate that the various ways in which the students explored the argumentation structures latent in the task emerged from the indeterminacy of the given diagrams and their potential meanings and relationships. In particular, both constructive argumentation and structurant argumentation were promoted in the process of logically connecting the diagrams. We also observed that the students used kinematic and spatial metaphors to describe the possibilities in the logical connections between diagrams while constructing argumentation structures. As a conclusion, we claim that diagrammatic indeterminacy can be considered semiotic potential or its source. 
546 |a EN 
546 |a KO 
690 |a argumentation structure 
690 |a indeterminacy of diagram 
690 |a virtual network diagram 
690 |a semiotic mediation 
690 |a semiotic potential 
690 |a Mathematics 
690 |a QA1-939 
690 |a Education 
690 |a L 
655 7 |a article  |2 local 
786 0 |n Journal of Educational Research in Mathematics, Vol 30, Iss S, Pp 199-211 (2020) 
787 0 |n http://journaleditor.inforang.com/journal/view.html?doi=10.29275/jerm.2020.08.sp.1.199 
787 0 |n https://doaj.org/toc/2288-7733 
856 4 1 |u https://doaj.org/article/fc9dd62dc3234a41b10f82d3e33f62cb  |z Connect to this object online.