Measuring What Matters Most Choice-Based Assessments for the Digital Age

An argument that choice-based, process-oriented educational assessments are more effective than static assessments of fact retrieval.If a fundamental goal of education is to prepare students to act independently in the world-in other words, to make good choices-an ideal educational assessment would...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Schwartz, Daniel L. (auth)
Other Authors: Arena, Dylan (auth)
Format: Electronic Book Chapter
Language:English
Published: Cambridge The MIT Press 2013
Subjects:
Online Access:OAPEN Library: download the publication
OAPEN Library: description of the publication
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

MARC

LEADER 00000naaaa2200000uu 4500
001 oapen_2024_20_500_12657_26061
005 20190121
003 oapen
006 m o d
007 cr|mn|---annan
008 20190121s2013 xx |||||o ||| 0|eng d
020 |a 9780262518376 
040 |a oapen  |c oapen 
041 0 |a eng 
042 |a dc 
072 7 |a JNKD  |2 bicssc 
100 1 |a Schwartz, Daniel L.  |4 auth 
700 1 |a Arena, Dylan  |4 auth 
245 1 0 |a Measuring What Matters Most  |b Choice-Based Assessments for the Digital Age 
260 |a Cambridge  |b The MIT Press  |c 2013 
300 |a 1 electronic resource (192 p.) 
336 |a text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a computer  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a online resource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
506 0 |a Open Access  |2 star  |f Unrestricted online access 
520 |a An argument that choice-based, process-oriented educational assessments are more effective than static assessments of fact retrieval.If a fundamental goal of education is to prepare students to act independently in the world-in other words, to make good choices-an ideal educational assessment would measure how well we are preparing students to do so. Current assessments, however, focus almost exclusively on how much knowledge students have accrued and can retrieve. In Measuring What Matters Most, Daniel Schwartz and Dylan Arena argue that choice should be the interpretive framework within which learning assessments are organized. Digital technologies, they suggest, make this possible; interactive assessments can evaluate students in a context of choosing whether, what, how, and when to learn.Schwartz and Arena view choice not as an instructional ingredient to improve learning but as the outcome of learning. Because assessments shape public perception about what is useful and valued in education, choice-based assessments would provide a powerful lever in this reorientation in how people think about learning.Schwartz and Arena consider both theoretical and practical matters. They provide an anchoring example of a computerized, choice-based assessment, argue that knowledge-based assessments are a mismatch for our educational aims, offer concrete examples of choice-based assessments that reveal what knowledge-based assessments cannot, and analyze the practice of designing assessments. Because high variability leads to innovation, they suggest democratizing assessment design to generate as many instances as possible. Finally, they consider the most difficult aspect of assessment: fairness. Choice-based assessments, they argue, shed helpful light on fairness considerations. 
540 |a Creative Commons  |f by-nc-nd/4.0  |2 cc  |4 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 
546 |a English 
650 7 |a Examinations & assessment  |2 bicssc 
653 |a education 
856 4 0 |a www.oapen.org  |u https://library.oapen.org/bitstream/id/3a2159a6-172c-4e59-9ef6-075f94363a74/1004024.pdf  |7 0  |z OAPEN Library: download the publication 
856 4 0 |a www.oapen.org  |u http://library.oapen.org/handle/20.500.12657/26061  |7 0  |z OAPEN Library: description of the publication