A Retrospective Study of the AL Technology Implant System used for Single-Tooth Replacement

<p><strong>Objective:</strong> The objective of this retrospective study was to evaluate the success rate of AL Technology implants used for single tooth replacement after a minimum of three years of loading at Center for Dentistry, Research & Aesthetics, Jatt, Almothalat, Isra...

Volledige beschrijving

Bewaard in:
Bibliografische gegevens
Hoofdauteurs: Muhamad Abu-Hussein (Auteur), Nezar Watted (Auteur), Dror Shamir (Auteur)
Formaat: Boek
Gepubliceerd in: International Journal of Oral and Craniofacial Science - Peertechz Publications, 2016-07-09.
Onderwerpen:
Online toegang:Connect to this object online.
Tags: Voeg label toe
Geen labels, Wees de eerste die dit record labelt!
Omschrijving
Samenvatting:<p><strong>Objective:</strong> The objective of this retrospective study was to evaluate the success rate of AL Technology implants used for single tooth replacement after a minimum of three years of loading at Center for Dentistry, Research & Aesthetics, Jatt, Almothalat, Israel.</p><p><strong>Method:</strong> Dental records for 43patients who underwent single tooth replacement using ALTechnology implant system at Center for Dentistry, Research & Aesthetics, Jatt, Almothalath, Israel during a three years period (2010-2012) were retrospectively analyzed. Only implants that were functioning for at least three years were included.</p><p><strong>Results:</strong> 152 AL-Technology implants were used for the replacement of single teeth in 43patients, 114(75%) implants were placed in the posterior regions, and 38 (25%) implants were placed in the anterior regions. All implants were restored with cement-retained crowns and have been in function for at least three years. Out of the total 152implants, two (1,3%) were considered failures as a result of significant radiographic bone loss. Therefore, the survival rate at three years was 98,7%.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The results of this study suggested that AL-Technology implants could be a satisfactory choice for anterior and posterior single tooth restorations.</p>
DOI:10.17352/2455-4634.000017