IMPROVING ENGLISH VOCABULARY USING TOTAL PHYSICAL TO THE FOURTH YEAR STUDENT OF SDN 3 SAMBI SRAGEN

• Main Author: FATIMAH , UMUL (Author)
• Format: Book
• Published: 2011.
• Subjects: Thesis; NonPeerReviewed
• Online Access: Connect to this object online
• Notes: https://eprints.ums.ac.id/13285/1/02._Cover.pdf; https://eprints.ums.ac.id/13285/2/03._Chapter_I.pdf; https://eprints.ums.ac.id/13285/3/04._Chapter_II.pdf; https://eprints.ums.ac.id/13285/5/05._Chapter_III.pdf; https://eprints.ums.ac.id/13285/6/06._Chapter_IV.pdf; https://eprints.ums.ac.id/13285/8/07._CHAPTER_V.pdf; https://eprints.ums.ac.id/13285/10/08._BIBLIOGRAPHY.pdf; https://eprints.ums.ac.id/13285/11/09._Appendix.pdf
• Keywords: L Education (General)

This research paper is aimed at describing the improvement of vocabulary mastery of fourth year student of SDN 3 Sambi using Total Physical Response (TPR). The result of the study is expected to contribute the teaching learning vocabulary. This study is an action research. The data used in this research are derived from event, document, and informant. The data are taken from direct observation, test, interview, and document. The writer implemented two cycles, which each cycle consisted four steps that are planning, acting, observing, and reflecting. The procedures of classroom action research were applied to the twenty five student's fourth year students of SDN 3 Sambi. Based on the observation, test, interview, and document, the writer draws the following conclusions: First, implementation of teaching vocabulary using TPR ran well. Second, teaching vocabulary by using TPR is effective to improve mastering of vocabulary. It can be seen from the significant difference of students' achievement before and after the implementation. The result of pre-test is 24,9 and the result of post-test is 82,06, so the increased of the score is 57,16. And the last, there are several advantages and disadvantages of teaching vocabulary using TPR, but it depend on the creativity of teacher.